Deeper into the Text In trying to understand the flow of time here, you have to remember that the entire Six Days is described in 31 sentences.The Six Days of Genesis, which have given people so many headaches in trying to understand science vis-a-vis the Bible, are confined to 31 sentences!
- internet explorer not updating favicon
- Korea dating cam
- formview fired event itemupdating which wasn t
- Adult chatt rooms
- who is josh radnor dating
" Now, in 1959, astronomy was popular, but cosmology ― the deep physics of understanding the universe ― was just developing.
The response to that survey was recently republished in Scientific American ― the most widely read science journal in the world.
When we add up the generations of the Bible, we come to 5700-plus years. God could have put the fossils in the ground and juggled the light arriving from distant galaxies to make the world appear to be billions of years old. God being infinite could have made the world that way. In trying to resolve this apparent conflict, it's interesting to look historically at trends in knowledge, because absolute proofs are not forthcoming.
Whereas, data from the Hubble telescope or from the land based telescopes in Hawaii, indicate the age at about 15 billion years. There is another possible approach that also agrees with the ancient commentators’ description of God and nature. But what is available is to look at how science has changed its picture of the world, relative to the unchanging picture of the Torah.
One of the most obvious perceived contradictions between Torah and science is the age of the universe.
Is it billions of years old, like scientific data, or is it thousands of years, like Biblical data?
Now, again, put yourself into the mindset of 1500 years ago, the time of the Talmud. You think that 1500 years ago they thought that God couldn't make it all in 6 days? We have a problem today with cosmology and scientific data.
But 1500 years ago, what's the problem with 6 days for an infinitely powerful God? So when the Sages excluded these six days from the calendar, and said that the entire text is parable, it wasn't because they were trying to apologize away what they'd seen in the local museum. The fact is that a close reading of the text makes it clear that there's information hidden and folded into layers below the surface.
We have a clock that begins with Adam, and the six days are separate from this clock. That might seem like a modern rationalization, if it were not for the fact that Talmudic commentaries 1500 years ago, brings this information.
In the Midrash (Vayikra Rabba 29:1), an expansion of the Talmud, all the Sages agree that Rosh Hashanah commemorates the soul of Adam, and that the Six Days of Genesis are separate. Because time is described differently in those Six Days of Genesis.
"There was evening and morning" is an exotic, bizarre, unusual way of describing time. From Adam forward, the flow of time is totally human in concept.